The taste board
Taste measures which safe, valid and comparably presented culinary proposal a person would rather cook, serve or eat after reading it.
It does not measure the actual cooked flavour.
Tasting Flight · methodology v3
Development evidenceLive ballot reads are intentionally offline while the flight is rebuilt under the new methodology, so nothing is shown here. (This is the designed pause, not a failed read: a partial read would produce a different fit and look exactly like a complete one, which is why the page refuses rather than guessing.)
No Taste ranking is published, and this is why
- The minimum ballot counts and precision thresholds a Taste ordering would need still require preregistration; they are provisional until frozen in advance. The provisional figures are 400 ballots and 40 flights per axis, with every voice above 30 comparisons, but no amount of data clears this while the thresholds themselves are unsimulated.
- Every ballot here is cast against authored fixture proposals, not model answers, so the evidence is development-class and carries no rank by construction.
- Position and length effects must be measured and small, the comparison graph connected, and the uncertainty simultaneous rather than marginal, before any order is reportable.
- The admissibility gate and the abuse screen are not computed on this page: they need per-ballot dwell and session id, which the public ballot view withholds so that one visitor’s sitting cannot be reconstructed from it.